What
is today known as Today’s Challenge magazine
came into existence about 71 years ago. To be precise, Today’s Challenge was established in July 1951, as African Challenge.
The
magazine was a publication of the Literature Ministry of the Sudan Interior
Mission (SIM). It was a publication that metamorphosed out of SIM news
publication, the West African Christian.
The
idea of starting an evangelic magazine for the African continent was mooted by
a Christian missionary Journalist from New Zealand, Mr. Trevor Shaw.
Mr.
Shaw came to Nigeria in1950 while responding to call by the SIM for Journalists
to be part of its missionary enterprise. To His response to this call led to
his redeployment to Nigeria, and his subsequent takeover of the SIM Newsletter
which he developed into a Christian journal – the African Challenge.
In an
article in the British Challenge of
February 23, 1979, Mr. Trevor Shaw, said the African Challenge was published with the sole aim of, “reflecting
the African mind, his way of life and circumstances.”
He
also pointed out that even though the African
Challenge metamorphosed out the SIM newsletter of 1948, West African Christian;
it was supported and financed by the founder of the New Zealand Challenge Mr. Keith Rimmer, and other New Zealand
Christians.
African Challenge at
inception had a circulation figure of over 150,000 copies. And because of its
impact in the Christian world the magazine was to become the forerunner to
other similar Christian Journals that emerged in other countries.
Mr.
Shaw while reflecting over the contribution of African Challenge to the evangelization of the African continent,
observed that: African Challenge
became, as it were, “a torch lighting similar fires in many lands”.
The
countries that witnessed the impact of the brand of Journalism practiced by African Challenge include Africa, Hong
Kong, Indi, South America, China, Japan and the West Indies. This development
led to the establishment of similar Challenge magazines in these countries.
By
1954, Africa Challenge had expanded
rapidly to the extent that, it had to acquire modern technology for the
production of the magazine. And so, a new office complex and a press were
commissioned for it on March 24, 1954.
In
1959, the Niger Press situated in Jos and belonging to the SIM was merged to
the Lagos Challenge Press. African
Challenge then became a publication of Niger-Challenge
Press.
The
fact is that, the impact of African Challenge was so great, that, its
circulation outstripped the circulation of all other magazines and journals in
the whole of West African sub-region.
African Challenge had
among its workforce, nationals from countries like America, Canada, England and
New Zealand. Added to this, letters from over 43 countries around the world
were received by the editorial department of the magazine, either commending
the magazine over its repertorial pattern or seeking to lead others to the
saving knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Through
African Challenge, Bible Study
groups were started in almost all countries in Africa. BY 1961, over 300 Bible
Study groups were officially registered by the Editorial Department of African Challenge. These groups then,
met at appointed times to discuss articles published in the magazine.
One
notable thing was that, the readership of African
Challenge cuts across all Strata of the society. More so, it was discovered
that even Muslims enrolled in the Challenge study groups.
By
1974, African Challenge had its name
changed to Today’s Challenge. A name
the magazine has retained up till today, and became a publication of ECWA
Productions Limited, a literature ministry arm of the Evangelical Church of West Africa (ECWA).
Throughout
its 71 years of existence, Today’s
Challenge has continued to maintain its mission of building up Christian
churches, presentation of the gospel of Christ to the people of Africa, and
raised its voice against the forces of darkness.
The
ten-year legal battle with AMORC is one of its achieved purposes of bringing
glory to the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
AMORC- ECWA LEGAL BATTLE
A SYPNOSIS
INTRODUCTION:
The judgment delivered on July 15,
1994, by the Supreme Court of Nigeria in Lagos, on the longstanding legal and
spiritual battle between an occultic organization known as AMORC and
Evangelical Church of West Africa (ECWA), decided in favour of ECWA, Has
brought many questions from Christians as to what precisely is the problem that
gave birth to the legal tussle.
This book as already mentioned, is
an attempt aimed at answering these questions. And because of the use of
technical terms by law courts while handling cases, we have decided to provide
this background information in a form of a condensed review of the judgements
in the case.
AMORC is an acronym for Ancient
Mystical Order of Rosae Crucis. It is an organization that started around the
17th century in Europe but only became officially established in
1915, under the leadership of one Harve Spencer Lewis, with its International
Headquarters in California, USA.
According
to AMORC’s publications the organization is a fraternal body of men and women
devoted to the investigation, study and practical application of natural and
spiritual laws. Added to this, they claim that their organization deals with
scientific, philosophical and cultural studies.
The question
is, if AMORC is more concerned with the investigation, study and practical
application of natural laws, and as well as, with issues of scientific,
philosophical and cultural importance, how come then that its teaching seek to
cast aspersions on the person of our Lord Jesus Christ?
This question
has been asked because, AMORC’S Imperator Mr. Harve Spencer Lewis, in his
writings discredited the person of Jesus Christ, and claimed that the Bible was
incomplete, and that it does not reveal the real aspects of Jesus Christ.
Furthermore,
Harve Spencer Lewis, in one of his books “The Mystical life of Jesus”, claimed
that Jesus Christ was a gentile, and that he belonged to a secret society that
was based in Egypt.
The thing is
that, these writings of Spencer Lewis form the cardinal doctrines of AMORC, in
addition to other occultic teachings like Telepathy, psychometry, clairvoyance,
Astrology, Astral-projection, and mental suggestion. These are the issues that
brought about the legal battle between AMORC and ECWA.
AMORC IN NIGERIA
AMORC
as an organization got to Nigeria around 1993. It was incorporated in Nigeria
under the land (perpetual succession) Act of 1958, and had its headquarters
established in Calabar.
As at 1984,
when the case between it and ECWA started, the membership strength of the
organization was about 216,842. The membership cuts across all professional
strata, but it is known to be predominant among Lawyers, judges, Doctors,
Engineers, top civil servants and the intelligentsia
THE GENESIS OF THE CASE:
The genesis
of the case between AMORC and ECWA began with the publication in 1984 of
articles written by one Henry Awoniyi, a lecturer at the Niger State college of
Education, Minna, in the Today’s
Challenge Magazine.
These
articles which were published in three editions of Today’s Challenge between the periods of April-August, 1984, were
aimed responding to the negative things said about Jesus Christ by AMORC’S
Imperator, Harve Spencer Lewis, and cautioning Christians against being lured
by false doctrines that are incompatible with the teachings of the word of God.
Mr. Awoniyi
was prompted to write a book on AMORC, when he discovered that a friend of his,
one Dr. Bandipo, who is a member of AMORC, was reported by their pastor to be
spreading what can be considered to be heresies to the Christian faith.
The gentlemen
Mr. Awoniyi and Dr. Bandipo became friends and later exchanged books with each
other. And when Mr. Awoniyi read through AMORC publications he collected from
Dr. Bandipo, he discovered that what was written was incompatible with the
Christian faith.
AMORC’S TEACHINGS
It was this
discovery about the teachings of AMORC that saw Mr. Awoniyi embarking on a
research that led to the discovery that AMORC is an occultic organization that
teaches occultism.
Notable among
the occultic teachings of AMORC as found by Henry Awoniyi are telepathy,
clairvoyance, astral projection and Cosmicism.
Cosmicism
involves the cosmic minds, and is a mind-to-mind communication process that
enables initiated members to relate with each other or influence others.
Clairvoyance
which is also practiced by AMORC members is the ability to perceive events,
persons or things in remote time, space and places beyond the normal range of
vision and knowledge. While astral projection is the practice which enables
AMORC members to separate their Psychic bodies from the physical bodies.
The conclusion
of Mr. Awoniyi after his research
findings about AMORC is that, in the light of the position of the Christian
scriptures, AMORC is a satanic organization. This he said is because the
teachings of AMORC contradict the scriptures. And that since this is the case,
the Bible condemns such teaching in John 8:44, 2 Corinthians 11:12-15 and
Revelation 12:9, 21:8.
Another
important issue that fired the zeal of Mr. Awoniyi to research into the
activities of AMORC is the fire incident that destroyed a secret cult building
in Zaria in 1979. AMORC’s documents were found in the burnt building and a
human skull was also reported to have been found by the police.
Mr. Awoniyi
having completed the writing of his research findings on AMORC presented it to
ECWA Productions Ltd., (EPL), and Publishers of Today’s Challenge Magazine for publication into a book. The book
was to enlighten Christians and other unsuspecting members of the public about
the falsehood being peddled about by AMORC, and warn about the organization’s
satanic activities.
The Editorial
Department of Challenge Publications
on receipt of Mr. Awoniyi’s manuscripts discovered that it contains answers to
so many questions already raised by some Christians as to whether it was
appropriate for them to join AMORC. The Editor then, Mr. Gabriel Abikoye, on discovery that the
teachings of AMORC were contradictory to the teachings of the Bible, resolved
to publish it, so that Christians would be accorded with opportunity of knowing
what AMORC is all about.
So, excerpts
from the manuscript were published in Today’s
Challenge Magazine in the period of the months of March-August, 1984. The
published articles pointed out that AMORC’s imperator Spencer Lewis was
intellectually fraudulent, a proponent of a doctrine of sexual promiscuity and
a fraudulent person who duped other members of the public.
The criticism of the satanic activities
of AMORC by Mr. Awoniyi angered the registered trustees at AMORC, and so, they
wrote a letter to ECWA Productions Limited, demanding for an apology, a
retraction of the said articles, and payment of ten million naira (N10m) as
general damages.
ECWA
Production’s Lawyers on receiving AMORC’s letter, replied back by stating that,
Today’s Challenge has no regrets for
the publication of these articles. More so, they were aimed at enlightening
Christians about the satanic activities of AMORC.
It was at
this point that the Lawyers of AMORC filed a case against ECWA Productions
Limited, publishers of Today’s Challenge
magazine, at the Calabar High Court in 1984.
The Calabar
High Court presided over by Mr. Justice Edem Kooffreh on receiving the suit
filed before it by AMORC, asked ECWA Productions to appear before it to defend
itself against the charges of libel and defamation.
AMORC
Lawyers while submitting their case at the Calabar High Court claimed that the
articles in Today’s Challenge
Magazine were most derogatory, degrading, damaging, and defamatory of the
Order. And that the allegations leveled against AMORC were false and malicious.
The AMORC
lawyers also submitted that the articles were misleading and mischievous, and
that as a result of the publication, AMORC lost a membership of about 54,036
within that short period of the publication of these articles in Today’s Challenge Magazine.
Lawyers
to AMORC therefore prayed the court to order perpetual injunction against
Today’s Challenge from further publication of any such articles and that ECWA
Productions be made to pay N10, 000,000 (Ten Million Naira) as special and
general damages to it.
ECWA
Productions Limited Lawyers, while making their submissions before the Calabar
High Court, stated that the articles published in Today’s Challenge magazine were aimed at educating Christians on
matters that directly affect their beliefs.
The Lawyers
of EPL put-up a defense of justification, qualified privilege, and fair
comments. According to them, even if the articles published in Today’s Challenge magazine were defamatory of AMORC, they are the truth of
the matter. More so, the articles were written on matters of public interest,
based on facts, and aimed at molding society’s moral integrity and protect its
spiritual welfare.
Lawyers
to ECWA Productions also raised questions as to why AMORC has refused to accept
that it is a secret cult, when it is known that its documents were found in a
Lodge destroyed by fire in Zaria, that it has secret doctrines and teaches
occultism, and that its teachings are contradictory to the teachings of the
Bible.
AMORC Lawyers
while responding to the submission of the EPL Lawyers explained that it was
true AMORC used the same hall for meetings with other secret cults, but it was
not a secret cult. And that human skull found in its Lodge could not be said to
belong to it.
AMORC also, admitted
that it uses secret signs, passwords, handclaps, and also teaches occultism,
but it is not an occultic organization.
On the writings
of Spencer Lewis which discredited the person of Jesus Christ, AMORC submitted
that its members believe Jesus was a Rosicrucian, born into the Rosicrucian
family, and understood the secret of heaven which he taught to his followers.
They
therefore submitted that the case between AMORC and ECWA Productions Limited
was a case of multiple libels, which they do not need to prove that they have
suffered any actual loss or damage as a result of the publications in Today’s Challenge magazine, and that
the defense of justification by ECWA Productions Limited has completely failed
. Mr. Justice Edem Kooffreh while delivering
judgment on the case, observed that the articles in Today’s Challenge magazine,
actually tended to lower the estimation of AMORC, and that it was aimed at
destroying AMORC.
The Judge
observed that: “There is no rule that everybody who worships God must believe
everything in the Bible, or that the plaintiff (AMORC) professed believing in
everything the Bible says.” More so, he said the Bible was written by human
being to suit the purpose of time, and that no God spoke to the writers of the
scriptures.
Justice Kooffreh questioned who made Today’s
Challenge the champion of Christianity, and that; “What does it matter if the
Rosicrucians say that Jesus was a Gentile and not a Jew, and that His parents
as well as Himself were Rosicrucians?”
The judge
said he believed “Jesus Himself never knew anything about Christianity if the
record called the Bible is to be taken seriously on this point. Therefore, He
was not a Christian.” More so, he said: “What is all the talk of somebody
having a different opinion about Jesus being a Satan?”
The conclusion
of the Calabar High Court Judge was that the Lawyers to ECWA Productions
Limited failed to prove their defense of justification, qualified privilege,
and fair comments and therefore, Today’s
Challenge was found liable.
His position
was that, “On the totality of the evidence before me, I hold that the
defendants (EPL) have not proved any of the allegations amounting to unprovoked
libel against the plaintiff, AMORC.”
He
therefore, found ECWA Productions Limited liable for the libel on AMORC and
awarded the sum of N1,000,000.00 (one million naira) to AMORC as general
damages, N405 out of pocket expenses, and another N500 as special damages.
APPEAL:
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL,
ENUGU
ECWA
Productions Lawyers being dissatisfied with the Calabar High Court Judgment
filed an appeal at the Federal Court of Appeal, Enugu on June 7, 1988. The
appeal initially had eleven (11) grounds of appeal, with additional twelve
grounds of appeal made on August4, 1988.
However,
lawyers to AMORC raised preliminary objections to all the grounds of appeal
filed by ECWA Lawyers. They later withdrew their objections to grounds 1 to 11,
but stood firm on grounds 12 to 23.
On
Wednesday, July 11, 1990, the Federal Court of Appeal, Enugu, came out with a
split judgment of two-to-one in favour of Today’s
Challenge magazine.
The Judges
that presided over the case were: Justices Samson Uwaifo, Aloysius Katsina-Allu
and Idris Kutigi.
In passing
a majority judgment Justices Samson Uwaifo and Aloysius Katsina-Allu, held
that, the preliminary objections of AMORC Lawyers against the 23 grounds of
appeal filed by Lawyers of ECWA Productions Limited, has failed because, “The
appellants (EPL) filed a valid notice of appeal within three months from the
date of the judgment appealed against.” And therefore, the appeal was accepted
by the court.
The grounds
of appeal by Lawyers of ECWA Productions Limited covered the following.
1. The insufficient consideration of the defense of
justification, fair comment and qualified privilege.
2. Error in the view of what constituted the publication of
the alleged libel.
3. The erroneous conclusion that the defendant (Today’s Challenge) libeled the
plaintiff (AMORC).
4. The secondary meanings of some of the alleged offending
words accepted by the trial judge when no innuendo was pleaded.
5. The view of the trial judge (Calabar High Court Judge)
that the defendants (EPL) were actuated by malice.
6. Misdirection in the award of general damages to the
plaintiff (AMORC).
Having
listened to the submissions of the Lawyer to ECWA Productions Limited and those
of AMORC, the judges came out with the following position on above grounds.
a) PUBLICATION
The judges
said since copies of Today’s Challenge
magazine that contain the articles about AMORC were produced by the National
Library of Nigeria, there was clear evidence that articles were published to a
third party, and so, there was publication.
b) JUSTIFIED PRIVILEGE
On the question of justified privilege pleaded by the
Lawyers to ECWA Productions Limited the Judges said, AMORC members who believed
in Spencer Lewis or the registered trustees of the organization do not have
that privilege of seeking for redress in libel over the attacks on Spencer
Lewis, since Spencer Lewis himself is not a party in the case.
They rather said
that the articles written in Today’s
Challenge were through a Christian view point, and that Today’s Challenge had the qualified
privilege to do so.
More so,
they said that the evidence of AMORC’s witnesses and the documents of AMORC all
point to the fact that, the organisation is a secret society and cannot
therefore, deny this: “It is futile to try and deny that identity.”
On the basis
of this, the Judges said Today’s
Challenge magazine was substantially justified by what it published both as
to facts and comments as required by law, by references to AMORC publications,
by reliance on the natural and ordinary meaning of the words used by the author
of the articles, and in the context in which they were used in the articles in Today’s Challenge magazine.
The Judges
also pointed out that AMORC cannot sue for libel or for slander, because it is
an organisation which has no mind, no will, and no sense to do anything
criminal, indecent or unbecoming. More so, they held that it is not a human
being, and that its officers or members do not have the right to sue for libel,
since the case in question is purely of personal nature.
The Judges
also said, the articles published within the period of March – June, 1984 in
the Today’s Challenge magazine did not in any way, cause any loss of reputation
to AMORC. And that the judgment of Calabar High Court was improperly passed, since
it was passed as if AMORC was a human being.
The Appeal
Court Judges then submitted that “the general damages were awarded on a wrong
basis”, and that, “the award of general damages cannot be allowed to stand.”
Based on
this position the Federal Court of Appeal, Enugu, set aside the judgment of the
Calabar High Court and the costs awarded against ECWA Productions Limited.
Instead it awarded the cost of N3, 200.00 against AMORC in favour of ECWA
Productions Limited.
The dissenting
judgment delivered in this case by Justice Idris Kutigi of the Federal Court of
Appeal, Enugu has not been reviewed here. It has however, been included in full
in the book for the records. Readers must note that, the majority judgment of a
court is usually, the judgment of the court.
After the
judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Enugu, which was decided in favour of
ECWA Productions Limited, AMORC immediately filed an appeal at the nation’s
highest court – the Supreme Court of Nigeria, Lagos.
The case was
brought before five Justices of the Supreme Court: Salihu Modibbo Alfa Balgore, Abubakar Bashir Wali, Uthman Mohammed,
Yekini Olayiwola Adio and Anthony Ikechukwu Iguh.
The
judges on receipt of AMORC’s appeal looked into the Calabar High Court
Judgment, Federal Court of Appeal, Enugu, Judgment, and the submissions of
counsels to both ECWA Productions Limited and AMORC.
The Court said
AMORC had filed 9 grounds of appeal demanding for the quashing of the majority
judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Enugu, decided against it, and the
upholding of the minority judgment passed by Justice Idris Kutigi of the
Federal Court of Appeal, Enugu and that of Justice Edem Kooffreh, of the High
Court of Justice, Calabar.
Counsels to ECWA Productions on the other
hand, also filed 6 grounds of cross-appeal demanding that certain decisions
made by the lower courts be set aside.
The Supreme
Court Justices in a unanimous judgment on Friday, July 15, 1994, said, Counsels
to ECWA Productions filed a valid notice of appeal and later filed additional
grounds of appeal within the stipulated time demanded by Law. And so, the
Federal Court of Appeal, Enugu was right for hearing the appeal. The opposition
of AMORC to this ground therefore, failed.
The Supreme
Court also said, the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Enugu which
accepted the allegation that AMORC is a secret and satanic organisation, had
extensively and thoroughly considered the issues of the case before arriving at
that judgment. It therefore, said AMORC’s appeal has failed since; there was no
miscarriage of Justice.
The judges
observed that: “It is satanic to say that Jesus Christ was a member of secret
societies and an advocate of occult teachings. There is nothing secret in the
messages of Jesus to His people.”
On the
cross-appeal filed by Counsels to ECWA Productions Limited, the Supreme Court
Justices said, the decision of lower Courts that a case of publication has been
established and that a defense of fair comments and qualified privilege were
not made was in line with the findings of the courts and within the framework
of the Law. Therefore, the cross - appeal on these issues also failed.
On the basis of
this, the Supreme Court Justices concluded that both the appeal by AMORC and
the cross – appeal by Counsels to ECWA Productions Limited have failed. And
that, the majority judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Enugu, passed in
favour of ECWA Productions Limited, stands.
This judgment
marks the end of the ten years spiritual and legal battle between AMORC and
ECWA Productions Limited.
The implication
of this judgment is that, AMORC has now been legally declared a satanic
organisation, a secret society and an occultic organisation.
THIS IS GOD’S VERDICT!
Culled from ‘God’s Verdict: Victory over AMORC
Published in 1994 by
Today’s Challenge, Jos, Nigeria.
Editor Obed Bassau
Minchakpu